Cox Lab
  • Cox Lab
  • People
    • Lab members
    • Teacher fellows
    • Collaborators
  • Projects
    • Intralocus sexual conflict
    • Natural selection
    • Costs of reproduction
    • Sexual size dimorphism
    • Hormones & dimorphism
    • Evaporative water loss
    • Quantitative genetics
    • Gene expression
    • Sperm evolution
  • Publications
  • Other
    • Evolution Education
    • Photos and field sites
    • Join the lab!
    • Conference travel

Sexual size dimorphism

Much of our research on sexual conflict and dimorphism focuses on a particular type of sex difference - sexual size dimorphism. Ultimately, we want to understand why males are larger than females in some species, yet females are the larger sex in many others. This phenomenon of sexual size dimorphism is prevalent across diverse organisms.
Picture
The figure below is modified from a recent book chapter (Cox & Kahrl 2015) and shows that sexual size dimorphism is highly variable both within and among lizard families. The cover photo on the right illustrates the particularly extreme sexual size dimorphism (males are 2-3 times more massive than females) in our focal species, the brown anole.
Picture
Picture
We study the evolution of sexual size dimorphism in several ways. First, by comparing patterns of size dimorphism across species with known evolutionary relationships, we have found that evolutionary shifts traits such as territorial defense (a predictor of sexual selection for large male size) and clutch size (a predictor of fecundity selection for large female size) are associated with evolutionary shifts in sexual size dimorphism (left panel below, from Cox et al. 2003).
Picture
Picture
At the population level, we use mark-recapture estimates of survival and genetic measures of reproductive success to quantify natural and sexual selection on the body size of males and females (right panel). Mechanistically, we study how hormones such as testosterone have evolved to either promote or inhibit growth, depending upon the pattern of sexual size dimorphism exhibited by a species, and how these effects are mediated by sex-biased gene expression.

Relevant publications

Cox, R.M., C.L. Cox, J.W. McGlothlin, D. Card, A. Andrew, and T.A. Castoe. 2017. Hormonally mediated increases in sex-biased gene expression accompany the breakdown of between-sex genetic correlations in a sexually dimorphic lizard. The American Naturalist 189: 315-332.

Cox, C.L., A.F. Hanninen, A.M. Reedy, and R.M. Cox. 2015. Female anoles retain responsiveness to testosterone despite the evolution of androgen-mediated sexual dimorphism. Functional Ecology 29: 758-767.

Cox, R.M.
, and A.F. Kahrl. 2014. Sexual selection and sexual dimorphism. Chapter in: Reproductive Biology and Phylogeny of Lizards and Tuatara, edited by J. Rheubert, D. Seigel, S. Trauth and B. Jamieson. CRC Press.

​
Cox, R.M., and R. Calsbeek. 2010. Sex-specific selection and intraspecific variation in sexual size dimorphism. Evolution 64: 798-809.

Cox, R.M., and R. Calsbeek. 2009. Sexually antagonistic selection, sexual dimorphism and the resolution of intralocus sexual conflict. American Naturalist 173: 176-187.

Cox, R.M., D.S. Stenquist, and R. Calsbeek. 2009. Testosterone, growth and the evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 1586-98.

Cox, R.M., M.A. Butler, and H.B. John-Alder. 2007. The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in reptiles. Pp. 38-49 in Sex, Size and Gender Roles: Evolutionary Studies of Sexual Size Dimorphism. Edited by D.J. Fairbairn, T. Szekely, and W.U. Blanckenhorn. Oxford University Press. 

Cox, R.M., S.L. Skelly, and H.B. John-Alder. 2003. A comparative test of adaptive hypotheses for sexual size dimorphism in lizards. Evolution 57: 1653-1669.
Picture

Cox Lab

Department of Biology
University of Virginia
PO Box 400328
485 McCormick Rd.
Charlottesville, VA 22904